Emergency department disposition prediction using a deep neural network with integrated clinical narratives and structured data.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

Emergency department (ED) overcrowding has been a serious issue and demands effective clinical decision-making of patient disposition. In previous studies, emergency clinical narratives provide a rich context for clinical decisions. We aimed to develop the disposition prediction model using deep learning modeling strategy with the heterogeneous data, including the physicians’ narratives.
We constructed a retrospective cohort of all 104,083 ED visits of non-trauma adults during 2017-18 from an academically affiliated ED in Taiwan. 18,308 visits were excluded based on the completeness of each record and the unpredictable dispositions, such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, against-advice discharge, and escapes. We integrated subjective section of the first physicians’ clinical narratives and structured data (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, etc.) as available predictors at the first physician-patient encounter. To predict final patient disposition (i.e., hospitalization or discharge), a deep neural network (DNN) model was developed with word embedding, a common natural language processing method. We compared the proposed model to a reference model using the Rapid Emergency Medicine Score, a logistic regression model with structured data, and a DNN model with paragraph vectors. F1 score was used to measure the predictive performance for each model.
The F1 score (with 95 % CI) for the proposed model, the reference model, the logistic regression model with structured data, and the DNN model with paragraph vectors were 0.674 (0.669-0.679), 0.474 (0.469-0.479), 0.547 (0.543-0.551), and 0.602 (0.596-0.607), respectively. While analyzing the relationship between context length and predictive performance under the proposed model, the F1 score at 95th percentile of the word counts was higher than that at 25th percentile of the word counts in chief complaint [0.634 (0.629-0.640) vs. 0.624 (0.620-0.628)] and in present illness [0.671 (0.667-0.674) vs. 0.654 (0.651-0.658)], but not in past medical history [0.674 (0.669-0.679) vs. 0.673 (0.666-0.679)].
The proposed deep learning model with the usage of the first physicians’ clinical narratives and structured data based on natural language processing outperformed the commonly used ones in terms of F1 score. It also evidenced the importance of the subjective section of clinical narratives, which serve as vital predictors for ED clinical decision-making.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.