Radiomics and deep learning models for CT pre-operative lymph node staging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomic algorithms and deep learning models to preoperatively identify lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).PubMed, CENTRAL, Scopus, Web of Science and IEEE databases were searched to identify relevant studies published up until February 11, 2024. Two reviewers screened all papers independently for eligibility. Studies reporting the accuracy of CT-based radiomics or deep learning models for detecting LNM in PDAC, using histopathology as the reference standard, were included. Quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2, the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS). Overall sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated.Four radiomics studies comprising 213 patients and four deep learning studies with 272 patients were included. The average RQS total score was 12.00 ± 3.89, corresponding to an RQS percentage of 33.33 ± 10.80, while the average METRICS score was 63.60 ± 10.88. A significant and strong positive correlation was found between RQS and METRICS (p = 0.016; r = 0.810). The pooled SE, SP, DOR, and AUC of all the studies were 0.83 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88), 0.76 (95 %CI = 0.62-0.86), 15.70 (95 %CI = 8.12-27.50) and 0.85 (95 %CI = 0.77-0.88). Meta-regression analysis results indicated that neither the study type (radiomics vs deep learning) nor the dataset size of the studies had a significant effect on the DOR (p = 0.09 and p = 0.26, respectively).Based on our meta-analysis findings, preoperative CT-based radiomics algorithms and deep learning models demonstrate favorable performance in predicting LNM in patients with PDAC, with a strong correlation between RQS and METRICS of the included studies.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.