Multi-model assessment of potential natural vegetation to support ecological restoration.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

Ecological restoration is imperative for controlling desertification. Potential natural vegetation (PNV), the theoretical vegetation succession state, can guides near-natural restoration. Although a rising transition from traditional statistical methods to advanced machine learning and deep learning is observed in PNV simulation, a comprehensive comparison of their performance is still unexplored. Therefore, we overview the performance of PNV mapping in terms of 12 commonly used methods with varying spatial scales and sample sizes. Our findings indicate that the methodology should be carefully selected due to the variation in performance of different model types, with Area Under the Curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.65 to 0.95 for models with sample sizes up to 80% of the total sample size. Specifically, semi-supervised learning performs best with small sample sizes (i.e., 10 to 200), while Random Forest, XGBoost, and artificial neural networks perform better with large sample sizes (i.e., over 500). Further, the performance of all models tends to improve significantly as the sample size increases and the grain size of the crystals becomes smaller. Take the downstream Tarim River Basin, a hyper-arid region undergoing ecological restoration, as a case study. We showed that its potential restored areas were overestimated by 2-3 fold as the spatial scale became coarser, revealing the caution needed while planning restoration projects at coarse resolution. These findings enhance the application of PNV in the design of restoration programs to prevent desertification.Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.