Impact of deep learning-based reconstruction and anti-peristaltic agent on the image quality and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography comparing single breath-hold single-shot fast spin echo with and without anti-peristaltic agent.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

While anti-peristaltic agents are beneficial for high quality magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), their use is constrained by potential side effects and increased examination complexity. We explored the potential of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) to compensate for the absence of anti-peristaltic agent, improve image quality and reduce artifact. This study aimed to evaluate the need for an anti-peristaltic agent in single breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MRE and compare the image quality and artifacts between conventional reconstruction (CR) and DLR.We included 45 patients who underwent MRE for Crohn’s disease between October 2021 and September 2022. Coronal SSFSE images without fat saturation were acquired before and after anti-peristaltic agent administration. Four sets of data were generated: SSFSE CR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (CR-A and CR-NA, respectively) and SSFSE DLR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (DLR-A and DLR-NA, respectively). Two radiologists independently reviewed the images for overall quality and artifacts, and compared the three images with DLR-A. The degree of distension and inflammatory parameters were scored on a 5-point scale in the jejunum and ileum, respectively. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels were calculated in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and iliac bifurcation level.In terms of overall quality, DLR-NA demonstrated no significant difference compared to DLR-A, whereas CR-NA and CR-A demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05, both readers). Regarding overall artifacts, reader 1 rated DLR-A slightly better than DLR-NA in four cases and rated them as identical in 41 cases (P=0.046), whereas reader 2 demonstrated no difference. Bowel distension was significantly different in the jejunum (Reader 1: P=0.046; Reader 2: P=0.008) but not in the ileum. Agreements between the images (Reader 1: ĸ=0.73-1.00; Reader 2: ĸ=1.00) and readers (ĸ=0.66 for all comparisons) on inflammation were considered good to excellent. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing inflammation in the terminal ileum were the same among DLR-NA, DLR-A, CR-NA and CR-A (94.42%, 81.83%, and 89.69 %; and 83.33%, 90.91%, and 86.21% for Readers 1 and 2, respectively). In both SMA and iliac bifurcation levels, SNR of DLR images exhibited no significant differences. CR images showed significantly lower SNR compared with DLR images (P<0.001).SSFSE without anti-peristaltic agents demonstrated nearly equivalent quality to that with anti-peristaltic agents. Omitting anti-peristaltic agents before SSFSE and adding DLR could improve the scanning outcomes and reduce time.2024 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.