Evaluation of the performance of various machine learning methods on the discrimination of the active compounds.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) methods performances, including deep learning (DL) on a diverse set with or without feature selection (FS), were evaluated. The superior performance of DL on small sets has not been approved previously. On the other hand, the available sets for the newly identified targets usually are limited in terms of size. It was explored whether the FS, hyperparameters search, and using ensemble model are able to improve the ML and DL performance on the small sets. The QSAR classifier models were developed using K-nearest-neighbors (KN), Deep Learning (DL), Random Forest (RF), Naïve Bayesian classification (NB), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Logistic Regression (LR). Generally, the best individual performers were DL and SVM. The LR had a similar performance to the DL and SVM on the small subsets. The nested cross-validation method was able to include different feature vectors in combination with different ML methods to generate an ensemble model for the datasets with similar performance to the best performers. The general performance for the baseline NB model was MCC = 0.356 (Matthews Correlation Coefficient), and it was improved to around 0.66 and 0.63 by NB assisted FS with subsequent SVM/DL classification and an ensemble model, respectively.
This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.