Clinical and genetic associations of asymmetric apical and septal left ventricular hypertrophy.

Researchers

Journal

Modalities

Models

Abstract

Increased left ventricular mass has been associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes including incident cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. Such associations have been studied in relation to total left ventricular hypertrophy, while the regional distribution of myocardial hypertrophy is extremely variable. The clinically significant and genetic associations of such variability require further study.Here, we use deep learning-derived phenotypes of disproportionate patterns of hypertrophy, namely, apical and septal hypertrophy, to study genome-wide and clinical associations in addition to and independent from total left ventricular mass within 35 268 UK Biobank participants. Using polygenic risk score and Cox regression, we quantified the relationship between incident cardiovascular outcomes and genetically determined phenotypes in the UK Biobank. Adjusting for total left ventricular mass, apical hypertrophy is associated with elevated risk for cardiomyopathy and atrial fibrillation. Cardiomyopathy risk was increased for subjects with increased apical or septal mass, even in the absence of global hypertrophy. We identified 17 genome-wide associations for left ventricular mass, 3 unique associations with increased apical mass, and 3 additional unique associations with increased septal mass. An elevated polygenic risk score for apical mass corresponded with an increased risk of cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation.Apical and septal mass may be driven by genes distinct from total left ventricular mass, suggesting unique genetic profiles for patterns of hypertrophy. Focal hypertrophy confers independent and additive risk to incident cardiovascular disease. Our findings emphasize the significance of characterizing distinct subtypes of left ventricular hypertrophy. Further studies are needed in multi-ethnic cohorts.© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.